Red
Dawn is the ultimate
cognitive dissonance film. It is both
simultaneously genius and unspeakably dumb; poignant and repugnant;
militaristic and pacifist; racist and worldly, and most importantly it is
reactionary and conservative at the same time.
I can imagine that the target audience for this film are die-hard
Republicans who are pro-war and anti-Obama – and yet at the same time I can
imagine that anti-war liberals will get an enjoyment out of this too. Only a film this stupid can be so sneaky…
The main characters of the film are Jed (Chris Hemsworth):
an egomaniacal Iraq War Marine veteran, and Matt (Josh Peck): an egomaniacal college
football star. They live in a small town
in Washington State and are learning to spend time together after Jed ran away
and joined the marines after their mother died.
This story unfolds for 30 minutes needlessly until suddenly one morning
North Korean paratroopers begin to fall from the sky and successfully invade
America. With no resistance. At all.
(The North Koreans have a new super-weapon that completely
wipes out all US defenses) Jed and Matt then escape to a cabin in
the woods in order to start a group of insurgents that have to repel the evil
foreign invaders. Jed teaches Matt and
his friends guerilla tactics and rudimentary military maneuvers in order to
rise up against the foreign aggressors.
What is so interesting about this film
is that it simultaneously evokes rightwing America’s worst fear (being invaded
by communists) whilst at the same time overtly defends the actions of America’s
‘enemies’ (forming an insurgency that defends itself against an invading
nation). There are lines in the film
where Jed is trying to rally the teenagers by saying, with no apparent irony:
“when you're fighting in your own backyard; when
you're fighting for your family, it all hurts a little less, and makes a little
more sense – Because for them, this is just a place. But for us, this is our
home.”
This could have come straight from the mouth of any
Iraqi citizen from the last ten years.
Later on in the film it shows the American public going about their
everyday lives only now there are military checkpoints and communist propaganda
posters everywhere. Sound familiar…?
So could you make the argument that the
film is anti-American? Cautiously. The film may have moments that mirror the
current middle-eastern quagmire, but the rest of the film celebrates current
American obsessions: militia and second-amendment ideas abound alongside
Football imagery and metaphors. I assume the filmmakers think that the current tension with North Korea as well as the fears of Americans that Obama is after their guns make this film really relevant - I feel it does the opposite though, just makes the film camp and immediately dated.
The film
is also surrounded by (legitimate) concerns
about racism
as the original Chinese enemy was digitally altered to become North Korean –
but what exactly do you expect from a film directed by a prolific stuntman with no other directing
experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment