The brilliant documentary Pussy Riot: A Punk Prayer is due to be released this year telling the story of the all girl punk band who were arrested in Russia after performing one of their songs in a cathedral.
I managed to talk to Mike Lerner (director) this week in order to discuss the film and the politics behind it. Here is an abridged version of the conversation:
[Ollie] How did you get involved with the
project? Do you have any links with
Russia?
[Mike] Well I’ve made a lot of art and cultural
films and I know Russia and the former Soviet Union very well. I grew up in the ‘70s as a punk so the image
of them [Pussy Riot] in the British press back in January immediately sparked
something in me (laughs). I love films
about art and politics and this was obviously a tremendous story, of course,
after they had been arrested, so we got involved after they were arrested for
this absurd act. We flew to Moscow and
started to get involved with everybody the legal team and the friends and
family. We followed the events across
the Summer until the verdict in October, dashed back to New York to cut the
film for Sundance in January.
Of course the story is still ongoing,
not a week passes without some sort of Pussy Riot news, whether it is Maria’s hunger
strike or the upcoming Olympics, which I think will be a big focus for
pro-Pussy Riot, anti-Putin rallies.
I really enjoyed that in the middle of
the film you gave the film a bit of time to look back at [Nadia, Masha and
Katia’s] upbringings and their early political beginnings. How did you get access to the Carriers of the
Cross [an extreme religious organization that opposes Pussy Riot]?
Well these people are obsessed with
themselves and are very easy to get on camera, they wanted to demonstrate their
beliefs at every possible opportunity.
So actually you just ask them and they’ll give you whatever you
want! We were thinking of making a
reality TV series with them, as clearly they are a quite humorous bunch… But actually they represent a potentially
violent and quite horrible element in Russian society – an extreme nationalist
/ religious outpouring, which is something that Putin has very much encouraged
and provoked. Indeed the whole Pussy
Riot trial is very much a product of this.
It wasn’t only that Pussy Riot offended
belief; they offended the church and therefore the state. They have been characterized as foreign
agents trying to undermine the state and yet the truth is far from that – they
are very patriotic young women who are trying to create a more just society for
their children to live in.
One of the questions I wanted to ask is
about the religious misunderstanding and the difference between the American
reactions to the film versus the European.
Obviously there is a big difference between our religious tolerance and
dissidents. Do the anti-pussy riot
commentators vary in each country?
It’s a good question; I think that the
Russian communities in America are very conservative, as is typical of ex
patriot communities. They are very much
against Pussy Riot, and I think that what it interesting is that they have had
a lot of support coming from Republican senators and from the right, yet if
they really delved into what Pussy Riot stood for and believed in then perhaps
they wouldn’t be so supportive – yet they see it as a very simple anti-Putin,
pro-freedom of speech story. It does
seem to fit with a kind of nostalgia for the cold war where we have seen a kind
of return to cold war rhetoric in America in regards to Russia. I think that people are hankering for those
days. I think that most politicians who
support them wouldn’t for a second if they knew what they were really about –
it’s a healthy paradox.
So, is it even feasible to show this
film in Russia itself – can you imagine that happening?
Actually we have been accepted into a Moscow
arts film festival in November, which we are looking forward to. What interesting is that one of the many
pieces of legislation that have occurred since the trial is that the definition
of the Pussy Riot video as an extremist video, so anybody that hosts it online
is actually breaking the law, so we obviously have elements of that so it seems
like our film is banned before it is even shown.
We do genuinely want Russian people to
see this film because then they can perhaps understand that these women aren’t
crazed hooligans but rational patriots who simply wanted to have a more
tolerant society.
I think one of my favourite single shots
in the film is near the end of the film when they’re sat in the glass cage
waiting for the verdict and the courtroom police are telling them to be
quiet. They respond by saying ‘why wont
the press hear us speak’ – there is an
obvious irony there.
Yes - there are many ironies in this
film
I like that when the film began it feels
like a music documentary and then it becomes a courtroom drama, which is
obviously very exciting, and even though I know what happens at the end,
tragically, you still have a nice pacing to the film. I wanted to ask whether this – and I don’t
mean this to be insulting – but is the film preaching to the converted? Who is your target audience really?
I guess as I said before ideally it is
for those people who have misunderstood the girls, and maybe this film is an
opportunity for those [audiences] to understand them. Maybe that is a naïve hope and maybe you
could possibly be right that the main audience for the film is people who
already dig them and think that they’re great.
I don’t mean this in a bad way…
I don’t take it in a bad way. I think that it is very difficult, as inside
Russia especially there has been so much propaganda; the state channels ran a
whole series of documentaries about how evil Pussy Riot are and the state media
was incredibly one-sided against them.
So it would be great to have the opportunity to put their case forward in
a more thorough way…
It still surprise me how many people in
the west are still anti [Pussy Riot], and think that they got what they
deserved – they think that freedom of speech is not as important as even being
perceived to be insulted. I think that that
is very disturbing.
One of the most disturbing moments for
me was when the prosecution lawyer, when she was talking about the people she
represented as ‘victims’. [The people inside the church who
witnessed the protest] I couldn’t
understand what she really meant by that.
I was so proud, or maybe pride is the
wrong word, but when they stood up in court and said “we do not understand
these charges” – I actually felt a single tear to be honest…
I completely agree, I think that this is
historic stuff.
Can I just ask one final question? Vladimir Putin is in the UK right
now – do you think she should be given the reverence, because he is kind of
the bogeyman - in America especially but even here in the UK, do you think that
he is as scary as people think he is?
You mention in the film that he could be in power until 2024…
Well, I think that the fact that he has
put these girls in prison for, you know, dancing a bit show how frightened he
is and how insecure he is. It is
something that has embarrassed the Russian judiciary, religious and political
system I think for years to come. It
seems like a fatal mistake and that in the long term the political discourse
and consciousness of young Russians has been altered forever and people are
perhaps more aware of the need for tolerance and progressive ideas than ever
before. So in the short term he has won
a PR victory but in the long term, who knows – Methinks he doth protest too
much. Anybody who was secure would have
just ignored this whole thing and seen it as a ridiculous waste of time, but he
has sought to get as much mileage out of this.
Famously, when Putin was in London for
the Olympics apparently David Cameron did raise the issue over their tea in
Downing Street and [Angela] Merkel very famously in public questioned him on
this, and Hollande has… It is kind of an
embarrassing ongoing saga.
Final question! Can you think of any other bands, or
movements, who are doing anything even remotely similar in any other
country? They seem so wonderfully unique
– so anarchic.
I think that they have been inspired by
events and situations in the past. There
are some punk rock demonstrators
in Indonesia – their were some protestors who were forced to have their heads
shaved and be rehabilitated. I think
that the punk spirit is inspiring contemporary movements around the world, in
Burma etc.
The militant feminism that Pussy Riot
represent is being replicated in different parts of the world such as Ireland,
India, the Middle East, Egypt – I think that they have really inspired, maybe
not the sole inspiration, some very hands-on, very proactive, very
we’re-not-going-to-take-this-shit-anymore feminism. Which is absolutely wonderful and about
time. It is quite incredible how little
progress the issue of gender equality had made in the last 20 years in every
society, look at the Saatchi/Nigella Lawson case…he is clearly an abusive
character and society shouldn’t tolerate this bullshit.
I remember when Thatcher died earlier in
the year, everyone was talking about women’s place in leadership roles – It was
so horribly patronizing…
I think the guardian did publish a
survey that showed in terms of pure economic wellbeing the fact that women are
worse off now than they were ten years ago on every level: quality of pay,
opportunity etc. It’s incredibly
depressing so we do need Pussy Riot. We
need a hundred Pussy Riots to get this thing shifted. It’s laziness and fear that’s not getting
this thing changed, we have changed in the past but we’ve slipped back into
complacency.
I loved the film and I’m going to show
it to as many people as I can – good luck with film and thank you very, very
much.
For my review of the film please go here
No comments:
Post a Comment