It is interesting that since the days that George W. Bush labeled Iran as part of his ‘axis of evil’ (it seems so quaint in hindsight – almost cutesy), Iranian cinema has had somewhat of a renaissance period with films winning prizes at Cannes, Venice, London and even an Academy Award. It seems like all of the political rhetoric simply fuels a public interest in the country and its way of life. Iranians are clearly very skillful at exploring their modern history in intelligent and exciting ways, from the fascinating film about young girls being denied access to a football game in Offside (2006), to the graphic novel adaptation of Persepolis (2007), to the truly unpredictable film about a family deciding whether to leave the country or not in A Seperation (2011).
It is hardly
controversial to suggest that cinema, although exciting and engaging, has
trouble with accuracy in its representation of history. All films are reductive by nature must edit
events into a narrative that focuses on certain pivotal scenes and motives for
the sake of austerity and entertainment.
There are thousands of worthy films with good intentions and plenty of
hideous revisions of history (Pearl Harbour?).
The questions with films that are ‘based on a true story’ like Argo then, are does it tell a good story
with admirable intentions? Or is it just
typical American-exceptionalism with a convenient ‘historical’ context?
The film is set in 1979
during the events of the Islamic revolution and the hostage crisis that
occurred in the U.S embassy – an affront that America has yet to fully recover
from. The story follows the C.I.A agent
Tony Mendez (Ben Affleck) as he concocts a plan with a Hollywood producer (Alan Arkin)
and a make-up artist (John Goodman) to smuggle 6 US citizens out of the country
under the pretense that they are a movie production team scouting locations for
a sci-fi b-movie picture. A zany
postmodern scheme that manages to split the film nicely between Hollywood,
where the plot is being concocted, and Tehran where the hostages are fearing
for there safety and the streets are running wild with revolutionaries. The calm comedy moments of America are
juxtaposed with the serious drama moments in Iran – artfully highlighting the
inherent differences between the two cultures, before showing the obvious
triumph of American ingenuity and wit over Iranian naivety and brute
ignorance. This said though, excusing
the questionable ethnic politics, the film is very enjoyable in terms of pace
and execution, the editing and post-production on the film are superb and it
looks great.
The accuracy of the
plot has been contested (see these
articles),
yet regardless of the specifics the plan itself is an audacious ruse that makes
for perfect Hollywood fodder. A film
about a fake film being simulated to manipulate America’s geopolitical and
cultural enemies? Standard Hollywood output.
If the rumours are true that the Iranians are planning a riposte telling
the other side of the story, it could well be a more thoughtful and nuanced
affair.
No comments:
Post a Comment